If She's a Slut, What Does That Make You, Limbag?

"What does it say about the college co-ed [Sandra] Fluke who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex? What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. [. . .]

If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch."- Rush Limbaugh

What does it say about the right-wing radio host Rush Limbag who goes before a national audience and essentially says that, if he's going to be paying money, he must be able to watch college-age women have sex.
And if he's going to be sitting in front of his computer watching women young enough to be his granddaughters having sex, what is he going to be doing with himself? Specifically, I'm wondering, assuming he's right-handed, what is he going to be doing with that right hand?
And if he's going to be doing what we think he's going to be doing, what does that make him? It makes him a pervert, right? It makes him a degenerate.

I have an idea about how to make the conservative dream of "abstinence only" a reality. And no one will have to pay a single dime for it.

If Limbag wants to force young women to post sex videos online for him to masturbate to, we want him to post the video, of him masturbating, online so that any woman who might be tempted to have pre-marital sex can watch it.
The libido destroying effects of such an action would serve as a fool-proof method of birth control by preventing the so called "slut" from experiencing any pleasure whatsoever from sexual activity.
All she would need is a puke-pail to catch the vomit.

I think that this would work a lot better than an aspirin between the knees, plus it would be cheaper, too. Aspirins cost money.